Mohammad was mentally ill, why emulate the sick?

Mohammad, a very sick person

The following evaluations eminate from many Medical-Historical scholars from around the world over a period of hundreds of years of focused analysis and research. Many of these facts are found in the hadiths while some have been destroyed to protect the false image and desired religious memory of the prophet to control Muslims.

They explain, in part, WHY anyone depicting Muhammad was and is to be killed [Cartoon riots]. Simply, he made up the death rule in the hadith so as to avoid ridicule over his ghastly appearance and disloyalty of any follower. Read why.

If you are a Muslim this is the actual deranged, but clever, madman who never allowed peace upon anyone and always took a 20% cut from all who did his criminal bidding. Please rethink your allegiance. You would not want him as a neighbor, business associate, or inside a mosque.

Muhammad was thoroughly narcissistic - self-love (inordinate), self-importance and other-world "self" proclaimed abilities (the messenger of god). There was an apparent "arrest" or regression in his early stages of libidinal development in which there was a focus on his own erotic pleasure - the sexual aspect as well as paedophilia involved in his case. As a younger man he was married to a wealthy woman 15 years his senior. Because his mother died when he was quite young, he developed a mother fixation attachment to the first wife, recorded in historical holy books of Islam. He was a "control freak" who was able to influence once peaceful Bedoin tribesmen to commit heinous acts such as mutilation and beheading of those they stalked. Driven by greed they did his bidding. Some considered him "Magic" or ginn while others openly mocked him.

He gave off a peculiar strong bodily smell, so repugnant from his maladies, the intense heat and lack of water, and infrequent bathing. His hair and beard were filthy and infested, knotted, and rank smelling.

"Too bad for humanity that Mohammed's temporal lobe epilepsy didn't manifest itself in less malignant ways..."

[The following are excerpts and medical observations from hundreds of scholarly works found on the www on Muhammad's grave physical conditions. The vast majority of all health references indicate that he was, indeed, a very sick man.]

From Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology, and Clinical Neuroscience by Rhawn Joseph-- Williams & Wilkins Press, Second Edition, 1996)

Muhammad, god’s alleged "messenger", was apparently dyslexic and agraphic (loss, partial or total, of the ability to write) and was known to lose consciousness and enter into trance-like states. In fact, he had his first truly "spiritual/religious" conversion when, as the story goes, he was torn from his sleep by the archangel Gabriel.

Muhammad was considered, at times, a basically kind and considerate man, but he was also known to fly into extreme rages and to kill, or at least order killed, wealthy infidels and merchants and those who opposed him for any reason. He was very sensative to any reference to his physical appearance as we shall see. These behaviors, when coupled with his increased sexuality, heightened religious fervor, trance states, mood swings, and possible auditory and visual hallucinations of a titanic angel, certainly point to the limbic system and inferior temporal lobe as the possible neurological foundation for these experiences.

RELIGION, LIMBIC SYSTEM HYPERACTIVATION, AND TEMPORAL LOBE SEIZURES OF MUHAMMAD.

Among a TINY MINORITY of humans, the nuclei of the limbic system have a tendency to periodically become over-activated. When this occurs, emotions may be perceived or expressed abnormally, and the sensory and emotional filtering that normally takes place in these nuclei is vastly reduced or totally abolished. Moreover, instead of being merely overly sensitive, those affected may suddenly experience extreme anger, rage, paranoia, depression, sexual desire, or even religious ecstasy. They may hallucinate the presence of threatening people, animals, or even religious figures such as angels or demons. Deepening of emotions, hallucinations, alterations in sex drive, and the development of extreme religious beliefs (i.e., hyper self religiousness) are not uncommon manifestations of limbic-temporal lobe seizures and hyperactivation.

In fact, certain individuals who develop temporal lobe epilepsy and, thus, limbic hyperactivation, may suddenly become hyper-religious and spend hours reading and/or talking about the spiritual messages (or other culturally relevant scriptures) and other religious issues imparted. Once this condition develops, they may spend hours every day preaching, chanting, or writing out their mystical and/or religious thoughts, or engaging in certain actions they believe have high religious significance. Many modern-day religious writers who also happen to suffer from epilepsy are, in fact, exceedingly prolific, and some who feel impelled to preach tend to do just that. All of these manifestations were apparent in Muhammad's behavior.

People who suffer from periodic episodes of limbic and temporal lobe hyper-activation, such as those with temporal lobe epilepsy, typically have seizures. It is not uncommon for these seizures to be preceded by an hallucination or series of them as he frequently ranted.

Isolation, as well as food and water deprivation, increased or decreased sexual activity, pain, drug use, self-mutilation, prayer, and meditation are common methods of attaining mystical states of religious and spiritual awareness, and have been employed world-wide, across time and culture. These states also activate the limbic system above normal function mode.

For example, not only can pain or a desirable food item or sex partner result in limbic arousal, but when the limbic system is denied normal modes of input, be it sensory, emotional, social, or nutritional, it can become hyperactive; stimuli normally deleted and/or subject to sensory filtering are instead perceived. That is; limbic sensory acuity is increased, and in some respects what is perceived is not always an "hallucination" in the sense that it really involves the perception of overlapping sensory qualities that are normally filtered out. Sensory filtering is quite common at the level of the amygdala, which contains neurons that are multimodally responsive as well as inhibitory via serotonin. However, when this filter is removed, hallucinations and/or the perception of unusual sensory qualities can result. This was a common occurance in Muhammad's adult life and perceived by many as mystical qualities.

The majority of Muhammad's biographers concede that he received all of his revelations from god, either in dreams or during seizures. During the painful episodes of seizures, Muhammad heard bells ringing in his ears and pearl-sized drops of perspiration trickled from his body even during the winter (Martin Ling, op. cit, p. 245). When fully recovered, he narrated the contents of the vision written down by scribes. Many times they wrote narrations of muhammad's peculiar swoons and utterances.

Those observations of Muhammad's behavior are indicative of the fact that he suffered from epilepsy and/or schizophrenia, two medical conditions that were a mystery to the people of his time. Dr. Gustav Weil, in a note to Muhammad der Prophet, discusses the question of Muhammad's being subject to attacks of epilepsy, a physical condition, "which has generally been represented as a slander, concocted by his enemies, as well as by the Christian writers."

His ailment appears, however, to have been asserted by some of the oldest Muslim biographers, now labeled as "hired biographers" by some modern Muslim writers (Dr. Rafiq Zakaria, Muhammad and the Quran); it having been established as being a genuine "assertion" on the authority of other writers, who were contemporaneous to their time.

He would suddenly be seized, they said, with violent trembling followed by a kind of swoon or, more accurately, convulsion, during which perspiration would stream from his forehead in the coldest weather; he would lie with his eyes closed, foaming at the mouth, and bellowing like a young camel. Violent writhing and spasms were observed.

Muhammad's Gigantism caused the excessive size of his extremities [head, hands, feet]; usually caused by over secretion of growth hormone from the pituitary gland. He frequently veiled his head and face, particularly while watching when his tribal plunderers were engaged in murder, beheadings, and theft at his direction.

History confirms Muhammads peculiar maladies.

[Translated from the Dutch.]

"According to the hadith Muhammad suffered from a long-lasting disease, which he treated by means of bleeding. He walked as somebody who comes down from a hill. His skin-colour was peculiar, not white, not too tanned, somewhat gaunt rosy, yet swarthy. His eyebrows were conspicuous and extended. He was sweating heavily, especially when he was receiving 'revelations'. He heard the noise of bells and voices. He had a great appetite and suffered from hunger. Notwithstanding his sexual relations with ten young women, he remained quasi-sterile: one only child after the age of forty years. During his last illness he suffered from intense headaches, losses of consciousness, back- and intestinal pains. He died at the age of 62 years. Psychologically he was known as 'trustworthy', somewhat retiring and prude. Initially, about at the age of forty years, he was depressed, retiring, and showed a tendency to suicide which he had shown in earlier years according to hadith. He spoke slowly. Most typical were his great hands, dough feeling palms, great feet, a long fleshy nose, well developed ears and a peculiar voice.

These indications suggest that he suffered from acromegaly. This hypothesis allows to explain almost all details found in the hadith. Psychologically he was considered as a 'trustworthy' person [only to his fellow plunderers]. Initially depressed and devoid of self-confidence, he considered suicide frequently. He suffered from hallucinoses and even hallucinations. http://users.skynet.be/sky50779/mohammed.htm

MEDICAL PATHOLOGY

*Soft tissue proliferation is one of the early manifestations. Leading to the classic features: enlargement of the hands, feet and facial features, the most common complaint of the patients; "Gigantism" ACROMEGLY.

In adults, the syndrome is characterized by local overgrowth of bone (skull, mandible). Note: In 1932 an English film was produced about a strange and powerful murderer. "The Creeper" starred an acromegliac named Rhondo Hatten.

Muhammad as a leader figure...

To the common and unlearned ancient Bedoin desert tribesman Muhammad would appear as a strange and all-powerful giant. Combine this with the sweats and delerious mystical rantings, his supposed "knowledge" derived from early life Jewish teachers, his total rejection by, taunting, and his subsequent absolute hatred of the learned and successful Jews, and you have a sick but natural angry anti-social murderer, thief, rapist, plunderer, and preying pedophile motivating the poor to take from others for a better life, always sharing their spoils with him. Under threat and fear, they even shared their young children for his pleasure and sexual gratification.

This sick and delusional madman has corrupted BILLIONS and continues to do so today! Please notify all mosques, madrasses, and CAIR.

YAWS Their are two (2) recorded specific detailed accounts of Muhammad's physical appearance and visual description given at different periods [stages] of his life by different chroniclers. It is difficult to ascertain if one might have been written truthfully and the other written as complimentary because the author feared for his life. In one description, he shows many of the overt signs and manifestations of later stage Syphilis.

It would not be inconceivable that Muhammad was a Syphletic because of his hyper-active sexuality. Since, in warm climates, the most vulnerable to the infection and spread of disease are young children from ages 6-12 years. Various accounts indicate that he frequently partook of at least 10-11 children, possibly more. Without DNA blood samples we cannot be sure. Compare the signs and symptoms with the prior text description.

Yaws (also Frambesia tropica, thymosis, polypapilloma tropicum or pian) is a tropical infection of the skin, bones and joints caused by the spirochete bacterium Treponema pertenue. Other treponematosis diseases are bejel (Treponema endemicum), pinta (Treponema carateum), and syphilis (Treponema pallidum).

The insanity caused by late-stage syphilis was once one of the more common forms of dementia; this was known as the "general paresis of the insane".

The disease is transmitted by skin contact with infected individuals, the spirochete entering through an existing cut or similar damage. Within ninety days (but usually less than a month) of infection a painless but distinctive 'mother yaw' ulcerous papule appears on the skin at the point of entry, it is often described as raspberry-like and is 10-50 mm in size. This lesion will persist for up to nine months and other secondary growths will appear on the body as the original one heals, there may also be inflammation of the fingers (dactylitis).

If untreated a secondary stage occurs after up to four months of latency, it is marked by more 'raspberry' growths but smaller and ulcerous - exuding a thin, highly infective fluid which attracts flies. These growths may also merge together into thick fissured plaques, which can occur on the feet and induce a distinctive gait. These secondary growths are irreversible but there can be relapsing lesions and asymptomatic periods.

In 10-20% of cases the disease can progress over a decade or more to a tertiary stage with destructive lesions of the skin and bones. Large subcutaneous nodules develop and grow before abscessing and ulcerating, these can become infected and may merge together forming serpiginous tracts. These tracts heal with keloid formation which can cause

deformities, disabilities and limb contractures. The bone lesions caused are periostitis, osteitis, and osteomyelitis, damage to the tibia can lead to a condition known as sabre shins. In a very few cases a condition known as goundou is caused where growths on the[b] nasal maxillae can result in extensive and severe damage to the nose and palate[/b]. The disease is identified from blood tests or by a lesion sample through a darkfield examination under a microscope. Treatment is by a single dose of penicillin, erythromycin or tetracycline, recurrence or relapse is uncommon.

Islam prevents us from exhuming Muhammad

Examination of ancient remains has led to the suggestion that yaws has affected hominids for the last 1.5 million years. The current name is believed to be of Carib origin, "yaya" meaning sore; frambesia is a Modern Latin word inspired by the French word framboise ("raspberry").

Alfred Crosby has argued that neither side has the full story. Syphilis is a form of Yaws, which has existed in the Old World since time immemorial. Crosby argues that syphilis is a specific form of Yaws that had evolved in the New World and was brought back to the old, "the differing ecological conditions produced different types of treponematosis and, in time, closely related but different diseases". (ref:225 Crosby)

Different manifestations occur at each stage of the disease. Lymph nodes of the head and neck Anterior Cervical These nodes, both superficial and deep, lie above and beneath the sternocleidomastoid muscles. They drain the internal structures of the throat as well as part of the posterior pharynx, tonsils, and thyroid gland.

The Arabs called it the "Disease of the Christians". The name "syphilis" was first applied by Girolamo Fracastoro in 1530 from the name of a shepherd in a poem by Leonardo da Vinci.

http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/syphilis

The early form was much more virulent than the disease of today, the incubation period was shorter, only a few months, and the symptoms were more severe. In addition, the disease was more frequently fatal than it is today.

Combined with previously noted apparent [rearched] maladies and observations Muhammad may have died of the final stages of Syphilis [Yaws]. You be the diagnosing doctor.

Muhammad was mentally deranged and suicidal: Ishaq:106 “I will go to the top of the mountain and throw myself down that I may kill myself and be at rest.”

Muhammad cleverly created Allah to control and manipulate the foolish, as do the Imams and Mullahs today, using petty dictators to do their bidding. Allah is NOT Ilah.

Tabari VIII:12 “‘Rejoice, Allah has promised us victory after tribulation.’ This increased the Muslims faith and submission. When cities were conquered Muslims used to say, ‘Conquer for yourselves whatever seems good to you because all treasures were given to Muhammad.”

Muhammad was a pedophile pervert. Bukhari:V1B4N1229-33 “Aisha [who was 9] said, ‘I used to wash semen off the Prophet’s [who was 53] clothes. When he went for prayers I used to notice one or more spots on them.’”

Muhammad arranged bribes for obediance. Tabari IX:37

Ishaq:596 “Do you hold a grudge against me and are you mentally disturbed because of the worldly things by which I conciliate a people and win them over so that they will embrace Islam and become Muslims?”

Muhammad took whatever he pleased with no regard for other's rights.

He was a plunderer. Qur’an 8:28 “And know that your property and your children are just a temptation.”

Muhammad was a Slaver, as are the Muslim Saudi Sheiks, owning women as chattel, marrying for one night, buying horis. Qur’an 70:28 “Preserve their chastity except with their wives and the slave girls they possess—for which there is no blame.”

Muhammad was a thief, as are all Muslims. Qur’an 8:69 “So enjoy what you took as booty; the spoils are lawful and good.”

Muhammad kept his promises as suited his whims. Qur’an 9:3 “Allah and His Messenger dissolve obligations.”

Muhammad was gravely affected as acromegly and yaws advanced in his body. Bukhari:V7B71N661 “Magic was worked on Allah’s Apostle and he was bewitched so that he began to imagine doing things which in fact, he had not done.”

Muhammad resented being challenged or questioned as do all Muslims.

Bukhari:V2B24N555 “I heard the Prophet say, ‘Allah hates for you for asking too many questions.’”

Muhammad's made-up god was vicious, like Muhammad. Qur’an 5:41 “Whomever Allah wants to deceive you cannot help. Allah does not want them to know the truth because he intends to disgrace them and then torture them.”

Muhammad was a liar. Ishaq:567 “Muhammad informed Umar {the second Caliph after him}, and he called the Prophet a liar.”

Muhammad, like all Muslims, thought he fooled everyone until he was found out. Bukhari:V6B60N662 “Allah’s Apostle said, ‘Some eloquent speech is as effective as magic.’”

Muhammad's god gave no love or comfort. He is fear and submission to threat. Qur’an 40:32 “O my People! I fear a Day when there will be mutual wailing. No one shall defend you against Allah. Any whom Allah causes to err, there is no guide. That is how Allah leads the skeptic astray.”

Muhammad used his god for evil plots and betrayal. Qur’an 8:30 “Remember how the unbelievers plotted against you (Muhammad). They plotted, and Allah too had arranged a plot; but Allah is the best schemer.”

Muhammad could not fool the Jews as he did the ignorant Bedoins, so he killed them. Tabari VII:85

Ishaq:363 “The Jews of the Qaynuqa replied, ‘Muhammad, do you think that we are like your people? Do not be deluded by the fact that you met a people with no knowledge and you made good use of your opportunity.’”

Muhammad is not believed. Bukhari:V4B52N233 “Allah’s Apostle forbade the people to travel to a hostile country carrying copies of the Qur’an. [He said:] Unbelievers will never understand our signs and revelations.” Muslims drag thathe worst written book in all the world everywhere they go. it replaces mind and soul.

Muhammad is responsible for more death than all of history's tyrants combined.

Ishaq:383 “One of the young men’s fathers confronted Muhammad and said, ‘You have robbed my son of his life by your deception and brought great sorrow to me.’”

Muhammad was known to be a deseased liar by many. Ishaq:496 “‘By Allah you lie,’ one said to another. ‘Liar yourself!’ ‘You are a disaffected person arguing on behalf of the diseased.”

Muhammad's evil has spread to 57 Muslim countries. In every country on earth Muslims are unwelcome because they are suicidal madmen, fools given to a fake paradise created in Muhammad's epileptic seizures.

Ishaq:327 “Allah said, ‘A prophet must slaughter before collecting captives. A slaughtered enemy is driven from the land. Muhammad, you craved the desires of this world, its goods and the ransom captives would bring. But Allah desires killing them to manifest the religion.’”

This was 9/11/01 in America.

Nay to Islam. Nay to muhammad. Nay to your controlled and miserable state of sub-existance foolish and deceived Muhammaden!

Shamelessly lifted from an anti-islamic website

How to talk to a moslem, if you must (thanks Ann Coulter)

Combat Stupidity with Humiliation

By Ali Sina

A member of the forum called MaskeMuslimah sent the following:

Quote: I am not a great debater but you mentioned ''stupidity'' and ''muslim women'', well it is unfair, cuz many muslim women who covers do hold jobs &/or have their own businesses (not talking about good old Badreya here), go to universities. I do not see how can a scarf could kill our brain cells but many people assume that we, the muslim women are brainless. I usually do not bother with these comments, but you, as an ex muslim yourself, u must have known some intelligent women, right? or your comment was only to provoque? or am I totally wrong?

I do not like your site but i'll tell u why i visit it : i find it interesting and except for the insults & degradation believe it or not, i have learned a few things on the art of debating.

Okay Masked Muslimah,

So, you want to know why I ridicule Muslims.

This is a war. I want to defeat Islam. Unlike most people who don’t know their enemy, I know my enemy very well. My enemy is an ideology not a people. However, an ideology if not believed and practiced by people is harmless. The danger comes from people who follow evil ideologies. Aztecs believed in human sacrifice and butchered many people. But since no one believes or practices that ideology, their ideology is not hurting anyone. Islam is an ideology of hate and war, but unfortunately over a billion people still believe in it and practice it.

I have proven that Islam is dangerous and if not defeated it will cause another world war in which hundreds of millions could die and billions would suffer terribly. The question is how we fight Islam.

Islam is not a doctrine based on logics, commonsense or reasoning. It is based on hypes and bravado. Muslims are triumphalists. Islam is a religion of idiocy. Its followers pride themselves in their blind faith. It is a fideistic religion, where faith is valued more than rational thought. In fact rational thought is despised and blind faith is praised. This can be easily seen from the statements of al-Gazali

(1058 – 1111) who said: “Where the claims of reason come into conflict with revelation, reason must yield to revelation.” and even Jalaleddin Rumi who said.

The legs of the rationalists is made of wood

The wooden leg is draggy and it's no good.

How do you fight with people who despise reason and pride themselves in their irrational faith?

I am a rationalist. A rationalist’s biggest weapon is reason. But when our opponent mocks reason, our weapon has no effect on him. He is basically disarming us.

Let us take a look at your own self. You come to this forum and pick the nickname “Masked Muslimah”. Why? It is obviously out of bravado. Do you have any logical and rational argument in favor of women covering themselves and wearing masks? No! There isn’t any logical argument in favor of women wearing hijab, let alone wearing mask. You do that out of bravado. It is a pack mentality. With this you want to make a political statement. You want to rub it in our face that you are a Muslim and no matter how much logics we throw at you, it has no effect on you. In fact a typical reaction of Muslims after reading a few pages of this site is, “Thank you, after I read your site my faith in Islam grew”. Now think about it. How can one’s faith grow after coming to learn that the man whom he or she thinks is a prophet raped innocent women, raided civilians without warning, butchered unarmed people, massacred defenseless handcuffed prisoners of war, enslaved thousands, ransomed people for money or threatened to behead them, plundered, had sex with a child and other shameful and despicable acts? It defies logic. Doesn’t it? It is inconceivable that any rational and decent person would want to follow such a monster. Nonetheless, most Muslims, claim their faith grew after they read these things.

Has anyone proven these charges are wrong? I have a $50,000 dollar reward and the promise to remove this site should anyone prove them wrong. You can read my debates with Muslim scholars in the debates page. As it is clear, no one has proven me wrong on these charges. So why people say after coming to learn all these crimes of Muhammad their faith in him grew more? It is out of bravado. It is an act of defiance. It is a defense mechanism. They lock themselves in their shell. They say you can’t hurt us. You can do noting to us. We are going to remain Muslims no matter what. We put our fingers in our ears and sing lala lala la la and we won’t hear you. In fact since you said these things we are going to become more dedicated Muslims and wear niqab from now on. You see? Your logic has no effect on us. On contraire, it has fired back and now we are even more devout Muslims than before. Hah! You lose, we win.

How can this be explained?

Muslims gang up together, they hail each other, and act with hooliganism. In Islam brainless devotion is praised, believing blindly is lauded. Questioning and doubting, that are faculties of superior humans capable of rational thought are disdained. The arguments that they present in favor of Islam are all logical fallacies. Here is a sample:

• Islam is the fastest growing religion.
• Muslims procreate faster and in 50 years we take over the Europe .
• This and that celebrity have embraced Islam, alhamdulillah.
• The fact that Muhammad was victories over in his wars is proof of his truth.
• And also they say blatant lies such as.
• Quran contains numerical miracles
• Quran contains scientific miracles

Hadith and Sira may not be true so let us close our eyes to all the crimes of Muhammad reported in these books.

Ah, but this is not true Islam.

How shall we deal with such people?

When reason has no effect on Muslims, we are completely disarmed.

Muslims are bent to take over the world through deceptive strategies. One group of them commits all sorts of crimes against humanity and the other group, says: Ah! but these are not true Muslims. Everything is just a game - a game of deception! One group quotes the Quran to cause mayhem and the other group says these are misguided. If anyone says any thing against Islam the entire Muslim world enters in a state of frenzied mass hysteria, lives are destroyed everywhere and they demand apologies from everyone.

Islam is based on stupidity, not on reason. It is psychopathology. Muhammad was a psychopath. We have a billion people emulating a psychopath. How shall we deal with these people?

Leaving them alone is not an option. Islam is evil and as Edmund Burke said, “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing." We can’t let Muslims destroy our world. We must stop them.

There are a couple of ways to do that. One is through logical arguments. In this site we have done our best to prove Islam is false with logics. However, as I said, Muslims deride logics.

The other alternative is to kill them preemptively. Killing a billion people does not sound very good. They are brainless idiots, but nonetheless you don’t kill even idiots. Of course if an insane man starts shooting at innocent people at random, we have no other option but to take him down. This might actually happen. It is very likely that Muslims take hold of nuclear bombs, detonate it in a few Western countries kill hundreds of millions of innocent people, and in a quick response the entire Muslim world go up in flames and all the Muslims in the West become slaughtered like chicken. This is the real scenario. This is the scenario that actually will happen by default unless we mange to change the course of history. Don't be fooled by the smiles of the foolish Westerner who now protect you and your right to practice your devilish cult. Once this fight becomes the fight of survival, these very brain damaged politically correct "nice guys" will slit your throat. There is an animal dormant within each one of us. Don't wake up that animal.

This is a very bleak future. This is where mankind is heading. Only Muslims are responsible for that – not anyone else. We are dealing with a billion zombies. There is no rationality, there is no commonsense. It is stupidity over stupidity. The more stupid you are the better Muslim you are. The allegedly “good” Muslims are the liars, the deniers, the hypocrites. These hypocrites wear a mask of moderation and claim Islam is a religion of peace. “Oh brother you don’t know Islam, Islam means peace. You must find the original Quran that the Saudis have hidden somewhere and don’t allow anyone to see. If you don’t know Arabic you can’t understand the Quran, all the two dozen translations of the Quran are corrupt. Arabic cannot be translated into any other language. All ahadith are false, all the history of Muhammad depicting him as a tyrant monster are forged by Jews. Islam is much like hippies during the sixties. It is all about love and peace and flowers.”

I am sick of it. And they have the chutzpa to come to me to tell me these lies as if I am a gullible westerner who does not know anything about Islam. Damn it! I am the descendant of that mad man of Mecca who started all this insanity. My ancestors were Sheikhs and Mullahs as long as we have the record of them. They were themselves deceived and deceived others with their ignorance. Don’t come to me with these foolish tales. Go and tell your lies to gullible Westerners. I don’t need you to explain Islam to me. I used to say these lies myself. Keep your game playing and taqiyyah for someone who does not know Islam.

So what shall we do? Logic has no effect on Muslims. Doing nothing means destruction of mankind. It seems we are in an impasse.

Humiliate them. This is my response. Lower yourself to the level of your opponent and speak to him in a language that he understands. He is full of bravado and vain glory. Mock him. Make him look stupid. Deride at him. Disgrace him. Destroy his pride. Make him look like the scum of the Earth. Make him the butt of the jokes. Laugh at him and at his stupidity. This is good for him. This is his remedy. The idea is to jolt him to reality. This is bitter medicine, but it wont’ kill him. If you don’t, you will have to kill him later.

When a young woman wears hijab, or niqab, she is applauded by her peers. “Mashallah, you are so great! Everyone must look at you and follow your example. Well done sister.” She is pampered, her ego is inflated, and she feels rewarded. The stupidity of the act eludes her completely. She is willing to suffer in the scorching heat of summer to prove to her peers that she is a great Muslima and receive their admiration. She walks in the streets and people pay attention to her because she looks odd. All this attention excites her. She is making a statement, I am different. That is all there is to it. She wants to be different, to stand out. It is the same as during the sixties when stupid kids used to put flowers in their hairs, smoked hashish, made love and sang Kumbaya to defy the “establishment”. The hippy revolution of the sixties was relatively harmless. The philosophy was about peace and free sex. This Islamic revolution is more akin to fascism. It is extremely dangerous. It seems history has a way of repeating itself. Every generation goes through it in one form or another. In the early years of the last Century it was communism that captured the attention of the youth; in the thirties it was fascism; in the sixties it was hippy movement; and now it is Islam.

Humiliation is a very effective method to counter this insanity. These brainless people are craving for their narcissistic supply, which they get from each other in the highly cultic atmosphere of Islam. We must cut off that supply. They must see that there is a price to pay for following the path of stupidity. The biggest mistake is toleration. We must not tolerate evil.

To convince themselves to wear the degrading hijab, Muslims have associated the concept of “modesty” to it. Hijab has nothing to do with modesty. It is a statement of defiance of the western values, of democracy and it is the sign of arrogance. We have to counter this image. Muslim women wearing hijab are given a false sense of superiority. They are made to believe that other women are sluts and sex objects and only they are modest and hence superior. This, like anything else in Islam, is a false belief. If unchallenged this lie is eventually believed. Any lie if repeated enough and is not challenged will be eventually believed. We must challenge it. We must demonstrate, first rationally, that women wearing hijab are actually regarding themselves as sex objects and not those who don’t wear it and then humiliate them. The rationality of this argument will have little effect on a people who deride reason but humiliation will.

In essence what I am proposing is to fight stupidity with humiliation. We have to replace this image of hijab as the symbol of modesty to a symbol of shame and sexuality.

Muhammad said women are 'awrat. 'Awrat means pudendum, the external genitalia especially of a woman. People cover their genitals, but not the rest of their body. Muslim women who cover all their body are making the statement that they are vagina from head to toe. It is too embarrassing to let men see our hair that is a reminiscence of our pubic hair. We must replace that mental image of a woman in hijab as a “modest woman”, by a huge walking and talking vagina. Women wearing hijab must be humiliated, scorned, laughed at.

Women for Muhammad were nothing but sex objects. Their function is twofold - give men orgasm and give him children. Beyond that women have no use except as maids. The following hadith make this clear.

"My father died and left behind seven or nine daughters, and I married a woman. The Prophet said, "Did you get married, O Jabir?" I replied, "Yes." He asked, "Is she a virgin or a matron?" I replied, "She is a matron." He said, "Why didn't you marry a virgin girl so that you might play with her and she with you " Bukhari 8.075.396

Now this is the status of woman in Islam. Her worth is in her vagina. If she does not have hymen, she is worth less. If she can't have children, she is not worth marrying. How can we respect Muslim women who worship a man who thought they are sex objects, deficient in intelligence and hell bound? How can a Muslim woman be respected when she has no respect for herself? "Stupid" is a compliment. This is beyond stupidity.

When you are dealing with arrogant people who deride at logics, you must descend to their level and knock their arrogance. When you talk to a university professor, you use a different language than when you talk to a two year old child. It is not degrading to talk to a child in a childish language. In fact it is foolish to use an academic language when you speak to a toddler. Muslims’ rational faculty is underdeveloped. In this sense they have the maturity of children. They are very much retarded. They do not understand rationality. It just makes no sense to them. Golden Rule is alien concept to them. When we deal with Muslims we must adopt a language that Muslims understand. Since rationally, they are at the level of children, and ethically at the level of beasts, we must humiliate them like we would humiliate misbehaved children. Muslims are fool, stupid, and zombies. We have to counter their bravado with ignominy.

This remedy may not feel right with the politically correct folk who don’t want to hurt people’s feelings and want to be always Mr. or Mrs. Nice. They are however, in a grave error. These lily livered “nice” folks must remind themselves that if we do not save Muslims from Islam, we will have to kill them one day. That would be after they kill hundreds of millions of us. If anyone thinks this is not going to happen he is just blind. When Oriana Fallaci cries “Troy will burn, Troy will burn”, listen to that modern day Cassandra. She is talking about Europe, but all the world is in danger. Fallaci is telling the truth. Armageddon is just around the corner. Don’t be a fool. Do not let your childish emotions blind you. Think rationally. Muslims are bent to take over the world. This is the plan set in motion by their psychopath megalomaniac prophet. These brainless zombies are incapable of rational thought. Like robots, they do what they are programmed for and that is to lie, to play the role of the victim, to deceive and to claim the world for the Satan Allah with violence and terror. Reason does not work with them. In this site alone there are more words of reason to fill a bookshelf. Reason has no effect on Muslims. Fear of Hell has paralyzed their brain. They are genuinely unable to think like normal rational humans. It is foolish to expect them do things that they are incapable of doing. It is like expecting hippopotamus to fly. Two options are left to us. Wait, until they nuke millions of us and them nuke them and slay them to extinction, or save them through humiliation.

I have been shouting for nearly seven years using all sorts of logics. I have posted countless arguments by other ex-Muslims who have tried in every conceivable way to show these sub-human Muslims that Mahund was not a prophet but a pervert liar. No Muslim has been able to defeat our logic. Despite that, Muslims are undeterred. We heard all sorts of excuses from them except acknowledging the fact that Muhammad was a charlatan and leave Islam. They propose reforming Islam, modernizing it, educating Muslims and all kinds of baloney, but our words fall on deaf ears. They are simply unable to cut their umbilical cord from that monster criminal and leave his sick cult. They see the evil in the Quran, they see whatever Muhammad did was despicable; but they can’t let go. Their brain is frozen. That psychopath has kidnapped their soul and their intelligence. They are just brain dead. Zombies – that is what Muslims are. Every one of them is a zombie. How can any decent person respect, let alone hold a monster like Mahund as a prophet? Don't say you are good. You are not good. You are a follower of a monster. How can you be good? If you don't know the truth, pull you head out of your sand hole and see it. Read the evidence that we have presented in this site. If you think you can prove us wrong, do it. But don't pretend you don't understand. Have some courage. Respect your self and use your brain. You worship a criminal who was worse than Charles Manson, Hitler or any psychopath you know. Isn't this disgusting? Aren't you ashamed of yourself? How much stupidity is enough?

Why in the hell you want to reform the cult of a psychopath? Why in the hell you want to keep the memory of that evil criminal alive? Where is your rationality? Where is your brain damn it?

They don’t hear me. They just can’t hear me. It is because I am shouting to dead people.

After Muhammad slew his captured opponents in the Battle of Badr, he threw their corpses, in a well and then stood at the opening of the well looked into it and bragged about his victory. Omar told him, "Are you talking to the dead? They can’t hear you". “Allah brought then back to life so they can hear me” Responded that insane man. At times I feel, like him, I have gone insane too and I am just talking to the dead who can’t hear me.

So what shall we do now? Wait until you commit the ultimate act of insanity and after hundreds of millions of us are dead, kill all of you like insects and cleanse the world from your stupidity? Is this good? Is this what you want? Isn't it better to rescue you with any means possible, and bring you back to the fold of humanity before you commit your insanity? I honestly think saving you idiots is much better than the first alternative.

How shall we save you? Logic has no effect on you. You deride rationality and pride in your stupidity. You are fideists not rationalists. You deny, you lie and lie even to yourselves. Your brain is paralyzed with the fear of Hell that that psychopath has instilled in you. We can’t get to you through reason. If we leave you to your devices, we will have to kill all of you eventually after suffering huge losses ourselves. What else is left but to humiliate you? This is my ultimate weapon.

I want to wage this war, now on a psychological level. I want to combat stupidity with humiliation, bravado with shame and ignominy. I want to lower myself to your level, descend to the gutter where you reside and talk to you in a language that you understand. I want to humiliate you, to make you see that being a Muslim is not “cool” but darn stupid. I want the whole world spit at your cult and flush down the toilet your holy book of terror. I want you feel the dishonor and disgrace of being a Muslim. You are zombies filled with hate and programmed to destroy mankind. We love you as human being but we can no longer tolerate your stupidity. Like any responsible parent with an obnoxious unruly child, we must be firm with you. Shape up or ship out. You can no longer throw your tantrums and get away with it. Leave this madness and addiction and come back home. Our arms are open to embrace you once you get rid of your insanity. It is all for your own good.

It is time that we give you a taste of your own medicine. You must be treated like a dhimmi. You must be humiliated and subdued, exactly the way your Quran says non-Muslims should be treated. I know Muslims do not understand the Golden Rule, but they understand tit for tat even animals understand that. We must speak to you in the language that you understand. As the followers of a psychopath narcissist, all of you have entered into his bubble universe and all of you suffer from narcissistic personality disorder. As such the only way you can communicate with others is by lying, deceiving or by being bully. Bullies respond to fear. So we must instill fear in your hearts just as Muhammad said in the Quran 8:12 and 3:151.

What distinguishes humans from animals is our rational faculty. Since as Muslims you deride rationality, you are just like animals.

Pray to your damn Allah that I win this war and you lose. Because if I win; you will live, we all will live and we will all join hands and become brothers and sisters. Yes we can make this world a paradise. If you win, we will all die and you will go to Hell for worshipping Satan, for being stupid like mule and for blowing up this beautiful world of God for a lie.

The Campus Jihad Continues

Campus Jihad

By ANTHONY GLEES October 23, 2006; Page A15

LONDON -- U.K. intelligence officials have just provided a chilling assessment of the terrorist threat Britain faces. The country has become "al Qaeda target No. 1," security sources told me, confirming last week's press reports. Intelligence services now judge Britain's "home grown" terrorists to be organized, trained and controlled either directly from Pakistan or via Pakistani networks in Britain.

Until now, intelligence services thought British Islamist terrorists had no hard links to al Qaeda despite sharing its ideology. "Clean skins" in the security jargon, they were believed to have acted alone or in self-constructed cells. This theory was the product of what MI5 thought it knew about the terrorists before last year's July 7 bombings, which was far too little. Just two months before the attacks, MI5's Joint Terrorism Analysis Center concluded, "there is not a group with both the current intent and capability to attack the U.K."

The ringleaders of the July 7 bombers, Mohammed Siddique Khan and Shahzad Tanweer, both former students at Leeds Metropolitan University, showed up on MI5's radar on as many as nine occasions before the attacks. According to Whitehall sources, credible intelligence indicated that Mr. Khan had visited Pakistan between November 2003 and February 2004 and sought to contact al Qaeda. But MI5 discounted the significance of these visits at the time and only started taking them more seriously early this year. The London bombers' connections to Pakistan were initially dismissed as harmless, requiring no further analysis. It was "obvious," security sources explained in the aftermath of the attacks, that people of Pakistani descent would visit "their families" back home or take a "long holiday or gap year" there. The generally accepted theory was that the terrorists had simply used information from the Internet to build their organic peroxide bombs.

Senior military intelligence officers now dismiss this line as well, believing the bombers received crucial weapons training in Pakistan. They argue that if Britain is now al Qaeda's primary target, it makes sense to look much more carefully at the Pakistan dimension and also at the links between virulent Islamic groups in Pakistan and the U.K. Many British Islamic colleges have ties to fundamentalist Pakistanis. Other links exist to extremist Kashmiri groups, in turn allegedly connected to al Qaeda or the Pakistani secret service.

MI5 has hugely upped its game, as recent arrests show. But MI5 also believes that the number of extremists is rising and not just because it now knows better where to look for them. MI5 keeps very close tabs on more than 1,000 extremists; 14,000 British Muslims are considered potential terrorist threats, security sources told me.

I believe a significant number get radicalized and recruited on university campuses. At least 13 convicted Islamist terrorists and four suicide bombers have been students at British universities. Radical Islamist student societies make full use of university resources. They operate Web sites, hosted by university servers, which direct visitors to organizations that glorify jihad and terror. These "religious" groups are given "prayer rooms" on campus, which are also used to disseminate extremist literature and DVDs. Muslim students concerned about these developments tell me that at many of these Islamic societies terrorism is portrayed as justified acts of "resistance." A leading imam in Birmingham often preaches on British campuses that the London bombers have to be seen as "martyrs."

Organizations like Hizb Ut Tahrir and Al Muhajiroun, which advocate a world caliphate, demand that Britain adopt the Shariah and express a violent hatred for the West and Jews, have repeatedly tried to gain student converts at the University of East Anglia. It is only thanks to a courageous campus imam that their infiltration attempts have been thwarted so far. His colleague at London Metropolitan University, Sheikh Musa Admani, repeatedly warns about Islamic radicalization at his and other London campuses. Just two months ago, the head of an Islamic student society and several fellow students at London Metropolitan were charged with planning to smuggle explosives on a plane bound for America. Yet university authorities usually consider these societies as "religious gatherings," and thus off limits.

Government minister Ruth Kelly two weeks ago urged universities to monitor their students more carefully and report signs of extremism to the security services. But many British universities are reluctant to step up security. Universities U.K., an association of British universities, criticized Ms. Kelly's proposals as "unreasonable," saying "there are dangers in targeting one particular group within our diverse communities." When I suggested last year similar measures the government now proposes, I was myself attacked by Universities U.K. The vice chancellor from the University of Sunderland asked my own vice chancellor to "shut me up." I was threatened with legal action if the name of a particular university was mentioned in connection with terrorism. Unfortunately, my research showed that Islamic radicalization is a threat on campuses nation-wide.

But British universities prefer burying their heads in the sand of political correctness. When the Foreign Office invited 100 academics to bid for £1.3 million of government funds to participate in a counter-radicalization program, the academics said no. John Gledhill, chair of the Association of Social Anthropologists, welcomed their move, saying last week that "it did appear to be encouraging researchers to identify subjects and groups involved with terrorism . . . that could be interpreted as encouraging them to become informers." Martha Mundy, a lecturer at the London School of Economics, dismissed the government plans as having "an overtly security-research agenda" starting from the (false) premise that there is a "link between Islamism, radicalization and terrorism."

Is Ms. Mundy seriously saying there is no connection between Islamism and terrorism? "Security" is not a dirty word, even if totalitarian regimes have abused it. Every British university subscribes to the 1997 Dearing Report, which states that the "aim of higher education is to play a major role in shaping a democratic, civilized and inclusive society." This is the basis on which the British taxpayer agrees to fund them.

Academic institutions should surely help protect Britain from those who clearly do not believe in democracy, are not civilized, and who try to harm us. Now that we are the prime target for Islamist terror, Britain's universities must get real.

a gift for 'Eid Al-Fitr

This ten-minute video , titled "Rise Up,"

was posted on Islamist websites on October 22, 2006, and was described as "a gift for 'Eid Al-Fitr." Produced by an individual identified as "Abu Osama" (whose real identity is unknown), it calls on the Muslims to wage jihad against the "Crusaders." A caption in the film explains that Abu Osama produced the film on the occasion of the establishment of the Islamic State of Iraq.

The film begins with footage of horsemen under the caption: "O ye who believe! What is the matter with you, that, when ye are asked to go forth in the cause of Allah, ye cling heavily to the earth? Do ye prefer the life of this world to the Hereafter? But little is the comfort of this life, as compared with the Hereafter" (Koran 9:38).

Next, several Al-Qaeda leaders and commanders, including bin Laden, Al-Zawahiri, Al-Zarqawi and a number of unidentified young men (who may be field commanders or intended suicide bombers) call upon the Muslims to join the jihad. The following are excerpts:

Al-Zawahiri says: "I urge you, in [the name of] the duty of jihad, which is incumbent upon every Muslim, to hurry and pursue martyrdom in order to kill the Crusaders and the Zionists." An armed individual calls: "[Oh] defenders of the faith, hurry and prepare [for jihad], this is no time for [internal] disagreement." Another individual, sitting under a banner that reads, "Expel the polytheists from the Arabian Peninsula," asks: "Are there no men in this nation?" and a masked individual declares: "Jihad is ancient, and the fate of [all] infidel leaders is one and the same: to be slaughtered."

The video then shows a scene in which a man is beheaded. This is followed by another beheading, even more grisly, in which the severed head is waved in the air. (Both scenes, and another graphic scene, have been omitted from the version of the film posted here, but are available upon request).

The film ends with a caption congratulating the Shura Council of the Jihad Fighters in Iraq on the occasion of the establishment of the Islamic State of Iraq. It also conveys greetings for 'Eid Al-Fitr, and expresses hope for the unification of all the jihad fighters in Iraq.

Abu Basir Al-Turtusi Calls on Tunisians to Revolt Against Their Regime

On October 22, 2006, an Islamic website posted a response by Abu Basir Al-Turtusi [1] to the Tunisian government's recent decision to enforce the law [2] prohibiting women from wearing the veil (hijab) in the public sphere. In his response Abu Basir Al-Turtusi describes the battle of Tunisian President Zin Al-'Abidin Bin 'Ali against the hijab as more malicious than the war waged against the veil by some Western leaders. "You are not [like the real] Zin Al-'Abidin," [3] declares Al-Turtusi in this message. "[A real] Zin Al-'Abidin… would not battle Islam and Muslims…would not fill his prisons with Muslims whose only crime is that they declare that Allah is their Master… Zin Al-'Abidin would not combat Muslim women… neither would he force them to remove their hijab…"

Abu Basir concludes his message by addressing the Tunisian people directly: "You should know that this tyrant… has no authority over you, and [therefore] you should neither listen to him nor obey him… [Instead,] you should all… rebel against this infidel and apostate tyrant and… [against] his regime…"

Abu Qatada Al-Falastini: The Pursuit of Religious Knowledge is More Important Than Jihad

On October 22, 2006, an Islamist website posted an old fatwa by the U.K.-based Muslim scholar Abu Qatada Al-Falastini, a key Al-Qaeda operative currently in prison. The fatwa states that "the pursuit of [religious] knowledge (talab al-'ilm) is more important than [waging] jihad in the path of Allah…" and that "the state of [moral] decay [among Muslims today] stems from the fact that the mujahideen and other Muslims lack [sufficient religious] knowledge."

The posting sparked a fierce debate among the forum members. Some rejected this opinion outright, citing texts from the Koran and from Islamic tradition to indicate the supremacy of jihad, while others accepted it. Among those who endorsed the fatwa, some argued that it prefers the pursuit of knowledge over jihad only when a Muslim's natural inclination is more towards study than towards fighting. Others speculated that Abu Qatada recommends the pursuit of knowledge in place of jihad only for Muslims who cannot participate in jihad for legitimate reasons, such as being geographically distanced from the battlefield.

Drug raid yields Los Alamos documents

Drug raid yields Los Alamos documents

By LARA JAKES JORDAN, Associated Press Writer Tue Oct 24, 9:28 PM ET

WASHINGTON - A drug raid on a Los Alamos scientist's home in New Mexico turned up what appeared to be classified documents taken from the nuclear weapons lab, the FBI said Tuesday.

Police discovered the documents at the scientist's home while making an arrest in a methamphetamine investigation, according to an FBI official in Washington who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitive nature of the case.

The police alerted the FBI to the documents, prompting a federal search of the unidentified female scientist's home. The official would not describe the documents except to say that they appeared to contain classified material.

Asked about the raid, FBI special agent Bill Elwell in Albuquerque, N.M., confirmed that a search warrant was executed on Friday night, but he refused to discuss details.

"We do have an investigation with regard to the matter, but our standard is we do not discuss pending investigations," Elwell said.

A spokesman for the Los Alamos National Laboratory, in Los Alamos, N.M., declined to comment.

Los Alamos has a history of high-profile security problems in the past decade, with the most notable the case of nuclear scientist Wen Ho Lee. After years of accusations, Lee pleaded guilty in a plea bargain to one count of mishandling nuclear secrets at the lab.

In 2004, the lab was essentially shut down after an inventory showed that two computer disks containing nuclear secrets were missing. A year later the lab concluded that it was just a mistake and the disks never existed.

But the incident highlighted sloppy inventory control and security failures at the nuclear weapons lab. And the Energy Department began moving toward a five-year program to create a so-called diskless environment at Los Alamos to prevent any classified material being carried outside the lab.

Even though Los Alamos is now under new management, Danielle Brian, executive director of the watchdog group Project on Government Oversight, said the lab has not done much to clean up its act.

"Los Alamos has always seemed to be rewarded for its screw-ups," Brian said. "We're waiting with bated breath to see if anything has changed."

The idea that police found classified documents at a home where a drug sting was being conducted is disturbing, she said.

"The problem is when you actually have those materials that are supposed to be protected inside the lab and you find them outside the lab in the hands of criminals — that should worry everybody," Brian said.

The FBI and the U.S. attorney's office in Albuquerque were "evaluating the information obtained as a result of the search warrant," Elwell said.

The federal charge of unauthorized removal and retention of classified material is a misdemeanor that carries a maximum sentence of a year in prison and up to a $100,000 fine.

Georgetown gets $20 million from prince promoting Islam

Georgetown gets $20 million from prince promoting Islam

Just months later, university ejects evangelical Christians from campus Posted: October 25, 2006 1:00 a.m. Eastern

By Bob Unruh © 2006 WorldNetDaily.com

The Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding at Georgetown University has been renamed after Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal donated $20 million to its projects. And while that may be just the tail, the dog appears to be moving away from its historic Catholic and Jesuit teaching philosophy too.

The Center's leaders say it now will be used to put on workshops regarding Islam, fostering exchanges with the Muslim world, addressing U.S. policy towards the Muslim world, working on the relationship of Islam and Arab culture, addressing Muslim citizenship and civil liberties, and developing exchange programs for students from the Muslim world.

The "Christian" part of the center's projects at the university that has a history of 200 years of higher education following its Christian founding, is conspicuous by its absence in its website plans for its 10-year future.

But that won't be a surprise to leaders of a number of Christian evangelical groups whose leaders recently were told to leave the campus and not list Georgetown University as a site for operations in the future.

That story, reported by WND earlier, still has folks wondering what happened to cause Georgetown officials to ban InterVarsity Christian Fellowship and others. InterVarsity spokesman Gordon Govier said the organization still doesn't know why the move was announced by university officials, who did not return WND messages left inquiring about the situation.

"We still are a little bit confused about what happened," he told WND. "We haven't been able to identify clearly what happened."

He said Christians in the InterVarsity organization still are meeting at Georgetown, but they have no official sanction and are meeting without recognition, much as many Christian churches in nations where religion is regulated meet.

He said there is a committee meeting that is supposed to hear concerns from Christians, and InterVarsity is hopeful there will be a positive outcome, but there's no time frame set.

But the time frame for other interests that have become relevant to Georgetown are a little more apparent. The school's Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding confirmed several months ago that the $20 million donation was made by Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, and a short time later the Center was given the added moniker as Alwaleed bin Talal Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding.

The organization now features a number of pro-Muslim statements and articles, with little reference to any Christian statements or understandings. It even has co-sponsored events with CAIR, the Council on American-Islamic Relations.

CAIR is a spin-off of the Islamic Association for Palestine, identified by two former FBI counterterrorism chiefs as a "front group" for the Palestinian terrorist group Hamas. Several CAIR leaders have been convicted on terrorism-related charges.

The center's chief, John L. Esposito, summarizes the goals of the organization clearly: "The Prince Alwaleed Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding is concerned with Islam and the West and Islam in the West. The Center, since its creation in 1993, has built bridges of understanding between the Muslim world and the West, addressing stereotypes of Islam and Muslims and issues and questions such as the clash of civilizations, and the compatibility of Islam and modern life – from democratization and pluralism to the status of women, minorities and human rights – and American foreign policy in the Muslim world."

The Center says it recognizes the increasing demands because of the world's "critical turning point in the history of Muslim-Christian relations" so it will expand its expertise base and operations, "as well as strengthen the website as a source of critical information about Islam and the Muslim world."

The Center's assistant director, Huma Malik, told WND that the $20 million came from the prince because the center is working on projects that interest him, but she could not comment on the influence of the donation or why the evangelical Christians were barred from campus.

The center was founded in 1993 in cooperation with the Fondation pour L'Entante entre Chretians at Musulmans in Geneva "to build strong bridge of understanding between the Muslim world and the West as well as between Islam and Christianity."

The message of acting as an information source for Islam was reinforced in the fact that while the Center's website includes a link for Islamic Resources, there is none for Christian resources.

It also takes a distinct policy stance, with Esposito noting in a recent posting that "despite 'HAMAS' victory in free and democratic elections, the United States and Europe failed to give the party full recognition and support," he wrote.

That type of behavior, he said, provides reasons for "many Muslim autocratic rulers' to retreat from democratization, and he cited a Gallup World Study that says it is the policies of the U.S. that generate hurt in the Muslim world.

"One billion Muslims from Morocco to Indonesia … tell us that U.S. policies, not values, are behind the ire of the Arab/ Muslim world," he wrote.

Those voices, he wrote, say that while America and the United Kingdom are disliked, other Western nations such as France and Germany are not. He also wrote that the U.S. is suspected because of its relationship to Israel.

"The United States failed to support UN mediation in the face of clear violations of international law, refused to heed calls for a ceasefire and UN intervention, and continued to provide military assistance to Israel," he said of the recent conflict, triggered by a military attack on Israeli soldiers.

"America’s unconditional support of Israel cast it in the eyes of many as a partner, not simply in military action against HAMAS or Hizbollah militants, but in a war against the democratically elected Palestinian government in Gaza and the government of Lebanon, a long-time US ally," he said.

"The primary victims in Gaza and Lebanon were hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians, not terrorists. In Lebanon, more than 500 were killed, 2,000 wounded, and 800,000 displaced. Israeli’s military destroyed the civilian infrastructures of both Gaza and Lebanon."

He said "HAMAS and Hizbollah" both are elected political parties, even though the U.S. and others have labeled them "terrorist organizations."

The Center, on a daily news clip posting, highlighted stories quoting a Mecca Imam saying non-Muslims are attacking Muslims out of fear of being over-run by Muslims and the London mayor noting that Muslims in Britain are being "demonized," comparing their recent treatment in London to the treatment of Jews in Nazi Germany.

Faculty members also are being interviewed by al-Jazeera, a network with sources in many terrorist camps.

The prince, who controls tens of billions of dollars in investments in Morgan Stanley, Fairmont Hotels & Resorts, Deutsche Bank, Apple Computer, Hewlett-Packard, Kodak, The Walt Disney company and ebay, works through the Kingdom Holdings company.

He also had given a similar $20 million gift to Harvard, which sponsors a Harvard Law School Islamic Legal Studies Program, and the Islamic Finance Project, which looks at the legal and sharia points of view of situations, officials said.

The Alliance Defense Fund earlier wrote a letter to Georgetown asking for reconsideration of its ban on several Christian groups. Officials said no response was received.

Those in a position to know have reported that the Christian groups were booted from campus for being too evangelical, because student clubs promoting Muslim and Jewish beliefs were allowed to continue existing with the formal campus structure.

The Christian groups' brush-off letter from the university starts: "Blessings and may God's peace be upon you!" but deteriorates shortly later to: "Protestant Ministry has decided to move in another direction."

As a result, Georgetown said, "Your ministries will no longer be allowed to hold any activity or presence (i.e. bible (sic) studies, retreats with Georgetown students, Mid-week (sic) worship services, fellowship events, move-in assistance, SAC Fair, etc.) on campus."

Further, the school told the ministry organizations, "All websites linking your ministries to a presence at Georgetown University will need to be modified to reflect the terminated relationship. Your ministries are not to publicize in any literature, media, advertisement, etc. that Georgetown University is or will be an active ministry site for your ministry/church/denomination."

Kevin Offer, who worked with the InterVarsity program at Georgetown, said something had been developing, because the university also recently had started requiring student ministry leaders to meet for formal meetings with the school. "School officials asked questions about what they 'tell students behind closed doors,'" he said.

US deadly raid on Sadr City angers Iraq PM

US deadly raid on Sadr City angers Iraq PM

American forces raid Shiite militia bastion in Iraqi capital without Maliki’s authorization.

By Dave Clark – BAGHDAD

American forces angered their key ally in the battle for Iraq on Wednesday by leading a raid on a Shiite militia stronghold in Baghdad without Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki's support.

US President George W. Bush, meanwhile, started a pre-election press conference by voicing "serious concern" over the past month in Iraq, citing the high death tolls, and said Washington was adapting its tactics.

A joint team of Iraqi special forces and US advisers, backed with helicopter gunships, triggered a fierce pre-dawn gunbattle with militia fighters in a raid on the Sadr City suburb of east Baghdad.

The US military said the troops were hunting the alleged leader of a death squad cell and had captured 13 suspects as well as killing between three and six enemy fighters in an air strike.

But Iraqi officials said that four civilians had also been killed and 20 more wounded, while Maliki said he had not authorised the operation and demanded an explanation from the US-led coalition.

The raid came as Maliki was already bridling at pressure from US officials to speed up his programme of national reconciliation and move decisively against militias such as radical cleric Moqtada'a al-Sadr's Mahdi Army.

Reacting to a claim by a senior US envoy that he had accepted a "timetable" for action, Maliki reiterated a pledge that he would tackle the militants, but only at his own pace and not under American orders.

"We will strike hard against those who break the law and endanger state security. There is no place for militias alongside the state," Maliki said, in a testy news conference.

The embattled leader denied, however, that he had accepted a US-imposed programme to disarm the gangs and reconcile Iraq's warring factions.

"Everyone knows that this government is a government of the popular will and no-one may set a timetable for it," he said, contradicting US ambassador Zalmay Khalilzad, who said Tuesday: "Iraqi leaders have agreed to a timeline."

Sadr City is a bastion of the Mahdi Army and Wednesday's raid triggered a two-hour pre-dawn gun duel in which the assault team called in an air strike.

"During the raid, Iraqi army forces came under fire and had to defend themselves. They requested support from coalition aircraft which used precision gunfire only to eliminate the enemy threat," a US military statement said.

The joint force did not say whether they had captured their main target.

Sadr supporters and an interior ministry official said four civilians were killed in the fighting and 18 wounded. There was no immediate word on casualties among the US-Iraqi forces.

Maliki, who has often in the past criticised US-led operations in Shiite areas, said: "We will demand clarification on what happened in Sadr City.

"This is an issue to be reviewed with the multinational forces so that it will not occur again," he added, in a comment that will revive US fears that he is not ready to tackle the Mahdi Army head on.

With the US military and Iraqi civilian death toll mounting and public support for the war plunging, Bush and his top aides in Iraq have been forced to rally enthusiasm for the mission.

Taking a long view, Bush told a campaign fundraiser in Florida that yanking US troops from Iraq would lead to a more dangerous world in which extremists run the Middle East and threaten US security.

"I see the threat. That is why we have got a strategy for victory in Iraq," he declared, in a challenge to critics running against his party in next month's congressional mid-term elections.

His words echoed those of Khalilzad, who on Tuesday described the battle to save Iraq from the hands of insurgents and death squads as "the defining challenge of our era".

General George Casey, the top US general in Iraq, said more US and Iraqi forces might be brought into the capital from around the country, and did not rule out bringing reinforcements from outside Iraq.

On Wednesday, many of the 15,000 US troops in Baghdad were hunting for a missing comrade, an American soldier of Iraqi origin who was abducted on Monday evening after going to see relatives in Baghdad.

Squads of US infantry were blocking roads in central Baghdad and conducting searches around the Karrada district for the second day since the as yet unidentified soldier left the heavily-fortified Green Zone on his own.

"He left without permission," said Lieutenant Colonel Jonathan Withington, a spokesman for the 4th Infantry Division. "US and Iraqi forces are continuing to search throughout Baghdad for him."

The missing soldier was last seen by his unit at around 2:30 pm (1130 GMT) on Monday, while relatives told the army that he was snatched from their house that night by three car-loads of gunmen.

Violence continued in Iraq on Wednesday, with a bomb attack wounding two Iraqi policemen in the centre of Baghdad and a suicide car bomb killing two more police in Baquba, north of the capital.

United Nations and Iraqi officials have estimated that sectarian violence and insurgent attacks on Iraq's US-backed government were killing more than 100 Iraqis per day even before this month's surge in bloodshed.

Human-rights Lies

Human-rights LIES

By Gerald M. Steinberg THE WASHINGTON TIMES Published October 23, 2006

In the recent Lebanon war, Israel was attacked with daily barrages of hundreds of rockets, launched indiscriminately by Hezbollah from trucks and other platforms located in towns, villages and fields. These weapons struck Israeli hospitals, schools, houses, workplaces, streets and even civilians in their cars. The Israel Defense Forces had the obligation to stop these deaths and injuries. In the effort to meet this requirement, the IDF used different tactics and weapons, including cluster bombs, which break into multiple submunitions in order to hit weapons, including rocket launchers, whose precise location is unknown or changing.

During and after the war, the United Nations Human Rights Council and powerful NGOs, such as Human Rights Watch (HRW) and Amnesty International, condemned Israel repeatedly for using cluster bombs. The NGOs are running a campaign for a treaty to ban the use of these weapons, and have issued a barrage of press releases, reports and statements on the injuries caused to Lebanese by the remnants of these weapons. According to HRW, the U.S. government heeded its demand to halt deliveries of these weapons to Israel during the war. On the surface, it would seem that the campaign on this issue was both morally justified and effective.

But a deeper examination of the issues shows fundamental flaws that undermine both the moral argument and the claim of HRW, Amnesty and other NGOs to a central role in negotiating arms-limitation agreements. Morally and logically, every nation under attack has the right to self-defense, and the rules of law, including various weapons bans that have been adopted, cannot result in greater slaughter of civilians.

The first treaty banning the use of chemical weapons after the mass casualties of World War I was adopted in large part because they were also ineffective and did not fulfill any military objectives. Other agreements and prohibitions, such as those placed on aerial bombardment, were short-lived and largely ignored because of their military importance, both for offense and self-defense. The efforts to expand partial agreements on the prohibition of land mines have failed precisely because in many cases no one has presented a better way to protect people, facilities and nations from attack. In an environment of bitter conflict and terrorism, the use of land mines for security can be the lesser of the evils.

Similarly, in repeated condemnations of Israel for the use of cluster munitions, activist groups such as Amnesty and HRW failed to suggest a realistic and effective alternative against deadly rocket attacks. Although largely missing from HRW's campaigns, there is no question that morally Hezbollah's arsenal of thousands of Syrian and Iranian-made rockets purposely used to kill as many Israeli civilians as possible constitutes the core violation of human rights and an obvious violation of international law. Massive Israeli ground and air attacks designed to find and destroy the rocket-launchers scattered throughout Southern Lebanon would have taken many more lives. This is the ugly calculus of war, and attempts to ignore this reality of human existence are both irrational and unethical.

In their campaign against Israeli use of cluster munitions, HRW and Amnesty are also coming with unclean hands and a not-so-hidden agenda. Officials from both played an active role in the infamous NGO forum of the 2001 Durban conference, which adopted a strategy to delegitimize the very existence of Israel. Their numerous publications and statements condemning Israeli responses to Palestinian terror far outnumbered the organization's reports condemning suicide bombings.

In this context, HRW Executive Director Kenneth Roth, who clearly has no military expertise or experience, demanded that Israel arrest Palestinian terrorists in Gaza and Jenin, and bring them to trial -- a policing approach that, when attempted, often resulted in much greater violence. In the case of the cluster-bomb campaign, HRW is not even suggesting an alternative.

These NGO officials have also used the millions of dollars at their disposal to join the political crusade against Israel's security barrier and in promoting dubious claims that fed boycott campaigns. The allegations in these reports were based on false or unverifiable claims of Palestinian "eyewitnesses" -- a pattern repeated by HRW and Amnesty during the Lebanon war. When Israel tried to use largersingle-explosive weapons against Hezbollah rocket attacks, this was condemned as "indiscriminate force." Every Israeli defense is labeled as unacceptable.

HRW's central role in promoting international agreements to ban land mines is also tainted by a strong dose of anti-Israel propaganda. In a conference on this issue that took place in Geneva in 2000, in which I participated, HRW-funded participants from Palestinian, Egyptian and other NGOs ignored the land-mine issues and instead used the opportunity for unrelated Israel-bashing. The annual report on land mines distributed at the conference, and published by an HRW affiliate, featured a bogus cover photo related to Israel, and the chapters on Israel and the Palestinians included false or misleading information.

In contrast, those who are motivated by genuine humanitarian concerns must present workable alternatives in pursuing prohibitions on specific weapons, including cluster bombs. A treaty that effectively prevents nations and people under attack from acting in legitimate self-defense is worse than useless -- it is also immoral.

------------ Gerald M. Steinberg, editor of www.ngo-monitor.org, directs the Program on Conflict Management at Bar-Ilan University in Israel.

EGYPT ALLOWING MASSIVE WEAPONS SMUGGLING INTO GAZA

EGYPT ALLOWING MASSIVE WEAPONS SMUGGLING INTO GAZA

The Israeli Internal Security Minister, Avi Dichter, has complained to US officials in Washington that Egypt is allowing smuggling by Palestinian terrorist groups of weapons into Gaza from Egypt, which is massively increasing. In talks with US National Security Advisor, Steve Hadley, Dichter urged Washington to apply pressure on Cairo to do more to seal its border with the Gaza Strip. "The Egyptians can and have to do a lot more to prevent the smuggling of arms to the Gaza Strip . The Americans don't know the scope of the smugglings and the Egyptians' capabilities. I believe that the Egyptians have considerable capabilities to make sure that the smugglings are prevented and that's what I said" ( Yediot Ahronot, October 19)

Additionally, Member of Knesset, Yuval Steinitz (Likud), former Chairman of the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee, in a meeting yesterday with American Jewish leaders in New York City, complained bitterly that Egypt is doing nothing to stop the smuggling.

Israel has been alarmed by recent intelligence reports pointing to intensified efforts by Palestinian terror groups to smuggle sophisticated weapons to the Gaza Strip. At least eight tunnels used to smuggle arms were uncovered by the army over the last two days, most of which were dug along the Philadephi corridor along the Gaza-Egypt border.

Also, a veteran analyst of Palestinian Affairs, Ehud Ya'ari, has disclosed that Palestinian Arab terrorist groups have been massively increasing their smuggling of weaponry into Gaza from Egypt. Ya'ari, who is Middle East commentator on Israel Television and Associate Editor and columnist for the Jerusalem Report, writes in a recent column that there is "an unprecedented arms-acquisition effort . underway in the Gaza Strip."

Ya'ari discloses that close to 20 tons of standard explosives have been smuggled into Gaza since Israel withdrew last summer, along with thousands of rocket-propelled grenade launchers and large quantities of rifles, pistols and grenades. Also, "several Katyusha rocket launchers, like those used by Hizballah against northern Israel, are already in the hands of Hamas and other terror groups. It is only a matter of time before they also get hold of shoulder-launched anti-aircraft rockets and, even more troubling, third generation anti-tank missiles, like the Russian Koronet. Such weaponry will enable the terrorists to effectively target vehicles and structures 3-4 kilometers [2 to 2.75 miles] inside Israel, and not to have to depend on their primitive high-trajectory Qassam rockets. Also under way is a feverish campaign to dig tunnels into Israel under the security barrier around the Strip, with the aim of facilitating terror attacks in Israel.

"What all this means is that the Israeli government will have to decide sooner rather than later whether to implement the recommendation of the army and the security services to retake the area along the border between the PA and Egypt. Such a move will entail operating inside residential neighborhoods of the city of Rafiah, and will once again turn the Gaza Strip into a sealed-off enclave. The diplomatic harvest that Ariel Sharon and Ehud Olmert hoped to reap from the withdrawal will simply wither away. The alternative is for Gaza to continue becoming a huge stockpile of weapons and ammunition that must ultimately explode, with disastrous consequences" ( Jerusalem Report, October 16).

ZOA National President Morton A. Klein said, "The US should use its $2.1 billion annual aid to Cairo as leverage with the Egyptian regime in order to make it clear that Egypt must stop the weapons smuggling. Moreover, Secretary Rice pressured Israel to give up all control over the Gaza-Egypt border crossing, eliminating Israel's ability to be involved in stopping the smuggling. It is Egypt 's responsibility to stop the flow of weapons to terrorists. Otherwise, the weapons now flowing into Gaza will lead to a new terrorist wave in which hundreds of Jews could be murdered. The ZOA urges the Bush Administration to take this step immediately.

"Avi Dichter and Yuval Steinitz's disclosures and Ehud Ya'ari's analysis are not only distressing in themselves but confirm other reports of massive Palestinian weapons smuggling that has included anti-aircraft missiles and Katyusha rockets, neither of which Palestinians had succeeded in smuggling into Gaza prior to Israel's unilateral withdrawal last year. This withdrawal included Israel ceding control of the Philadelphia corridor along the Gaza-Egypt border to Palestinian Authority (PA) control and placed more importance on the role played by Egypt, which has not stopped the flow of weapons into Gaza .

"The ZOA warned against the dire consequences of this move at the time and its likely consequences and urged that the Israeli government to reverse its decision and retake control. Last November, we stated that 'security for Israel would be weakened by handing over authority for the Gaza-Egypt border to the PA and Egypt and . there has been an influx of illegal weaponry and terrorists into Gaza from Egypt since Israel withdrew from Gaza. Now, the crossing is to be reopened but Israel will have no power to stop terrorists or goods entering Gaza.' Tragically, as Ya'ari explains in detail, this is precisely what has continued to happen.

"Therefore, it is not surprising that this week, a year after unilaterally retreating from Gaza and the Egyptian border area and uprooting 9,000 Jews from their homes, schools, synagogues, farms and businesses, Israeli forces returned to take over control of the border area and started destroying smuggling tunnels that had been previously detected by Israeli forces but rebuilt as soon as Israel left last year. In recent weeks, twenty such tunnels have been discovered in the area. There is no substitute for Israel at a minimum exercising security control in this area. We urge the Olmert government to reassert Israeli control indefinitely in this area, irrespective of whatever international pressure might be exerted on Israel to again leave. The security of Israeli men, women and children and indeed of the country itself, must take precedence over the opinions of foreign leaders and governments